Get Involved!
Sign up as a Citizen Journalist and get involved in Information Activism.
Sign Up for Watchdog Updates!
The school budget crisis has been a consistent theme in the local newspapers over the past few months. But I notice two words conspicuously missing from this debate: Charter Schools. Why is this concept relevant to the budget? Let’s look at the example of the Hillsboro School District, where I live. Here are some interesting facts about City View, Hillsboro’s one charter school:
- City View spends only about $4774 per student, compared to the district’s overall spending of about $11,507 per student ($240,752,767 budget / 20923 students, in the proposed budget posted online).
- City View has a waiting list of 147 students.
- City View asked for permission to grow its capacity by 200, but this request was refused by the school board in 2010. In 2011 the board allowed a slight expansion– by only 16 students.
So we have a successful public school that spends less than half per student compared to our traditional schools, and is willing to accommodate hundreds more students– but has been rebuffed and suppressed by our school board. Does this make sense, in a time when we are repeatedly told that we are in a budget crisis? (And here I haven’t even mentioned the educational merits of charter schools, which are not the focus of this post, though evident enough in the size of City View’s waiting list. How many non-charters anywhere in Oregon have a waiting list of 147 students? If you’re curious for more general info on charter schools, look here or here.)
It’s also important to recognize that City View is not some unique outlier among charter schools: long waiting lists, budgets that are a fraction of the traditional schools’ budgets, and enrollment caps enforced by local school boards are common characteristics of charter schools throughout the state. If you are in another district, chances are that your own local school board is unnecessarily limiting charter schools in order to protect the union-dominated and expensive traditional public schools– even as they cry about their lack of budget. So regardless of what area you live in, you should call or email your local school board and demand that they create real long-term savings by expanding charter school opportunities for the children of your district.
- Erik Seligman, Hillsboro, OR
Categories:
Budget and Finance, Education
Tags: charter schools, education, OEA, Oregon, public education, school funding, spending, teacher unions
Tags: charter schools, education, OEA, Oregon, public education, school funding, spending, teacher unions
RELATED ARTICLES
- Should WA State Legislators do a D.C. Thing?
- Kansas needs to focus on growth when wrapping up session
- To boost jobs and prosperity, Kansas should cut spending
- Intrust Bank Arena depreciation expense is important, even today
- Progress in Kansas: Progressives Up in Arms Over Conservative Governance
COMMENTS
comments powered by Disqus










