Sign up as a Citizen Journalist and get involved in Information Activism.
Sign Up for Watchdog Updates!
At a Wichita City Council meeting last August, Council Member Lavonta Williams (district 1, northeast Wichita) advised taxpayers on what to do if they disagree with action taken by the council: Just don’t go there.
The topic that day was whether the council should decide to add fluoride to the city’s water, or should it let citizens vote on the matter. Williams expressed concern that if the council were to decide to fluoridate Wichita’s water, citizens would not be able to avoid ingesting the added fluoride. They wouldn’t have a choice.
By way of analogy, Williams counseled the concerned citizens: “Did you like the art that went down to WaterWalk? Maybe you didn’t. But you don’t have to go there.”
She also said we don’t have to go to the apartments that were built at WaterWalk, and we don’t have to stay at the Ambassador Hotel.
True, we can avoid these government-sponsored and subsidized places if we want to. But what Williams may have forgotten is that we can’t avoid being forced to pay for them.
Besides that, what does it say about a government where if we disagree with its actions, we’re told “you don’t have to go there”?
Tags: Economic development, Lavonta Williams, Subsidy, Taxation, Wichita City Council, Wichita city government
- Money and Government, Freedom and Prosperity: The Federal Dollar Hangs in the Balance
- KS: Wichita city council advances economic development
- Federal grants seen to increase future local spending
- NY tax scheme unlikely to attract oil and gas tech startups
- Obamacare hurts marriages, gives incentive for divorce