Sign up as a Citizen Journalist and get involved in Information Activism.
Sign Up for Watchdog Updates!
A committee hearing on the subject of taxpayer-funded lobbying in Kansas drew many taxpayer-funded lobbyists who testified that taxpayer-funded lobbying is a good thing. In fact, in the words of the director of the League of Kansas Municipalities, “Muzzling the opposition is about as un-democratic as it gets.”
That executive, Don Moler, being a taxpayer-funded lobbyist himself, has a direct financial stake in the matter.
How bad a problem is taxpayer-funded lobbying? Here’s what Phil Kerpen wrote:
Taxpayer-funded lobbying is a self-perpetuating problem. … The perpetual big-government expansion machine must be shut down. State and local governments already have their interests represented in Congress — by the senators and representatives whose job it is to represent their constituents. The enormous diversion of taxpayer resources entailed in siphoning off tax dollars at the state and local level to pay for lobbyists who push for ever bigger government must stop. Tax dollars should be used to deliver necessary government services, not to lobby for bigger government.
A proposal for Kansas governmental units using taxpayer-funded lobbyists
What do lobbyists, including taxpayer-funded lobbyists, do?
One thing they do is testify before committees, in both verbal and written form.
Another thing they do is to prepare reports for the clients, advising them on upcoming legislation, analyzing how it affects them, and what the prospects for the bill might be.
They also meet with legislators and their clients, which are your elected officials.
Here’s a proposal that will help citizens make best use of their taxpayer-funded lobbyists:
I see nothing in the Kansas Open Records Act that allows local governmental units in Kansas to refuse disclosing these documents: testimony, reports by lobbyists to their government clients, and the lobbyists’ calendars (or billing records for contract lobbyists).
Instead of making citizens ask for these records, possibly paying fees to obtain what they’re already paying for, why don’t local governments post these documents immediately on their websites?
Citizens could then benefit from the activities of the lobbyists they’re paying for. They could lean more about legislation as it works its way through the process. Citizens could judge whether the positions taken by the government lobbyists they’re paying for are aligned with their policy preferences.
If the actions taken by taxpayer-funded lobbyists are truly in the public interest, you’d think that cities, counties, and school boards would already be making this information easily available. In any case, there should be no resistance to starting this program immediately. Today, as the legislature is currently in session.
If any local governmental units feel this is too much of a burden, here’s my offer: When your lobbyist sends you an email with testimony, legislative reports, or anything else, just forward the email to me (email@example.com). I’ll take care of the rest.
(Editor’s Note: This article was originally published on the Voice for Liberty in Wichita blog )
Tags: Kansas, lobbyists, Phil Kirpen, SB 109, taxpayer-funded lobbying
- Wichita city hall doesn’t need a sales tax to promote transparency
- Court watching in Fulton County, Georgia
- Clock is ticking in James Brown estate
- A simple step towards government transparency in Wichita
- Errors in Wichita Union Station development proposal